Explore how organizations have used Stereologic to uncover hidden work, quantify operational opportunity and build a measured basis for transformation.
Each outcome below carries the operation it was measured in, the period it was measured over and the method behind the number — so you can judge the evidence rather than the adjective.
Reduce operational cost while improving service performance.
Back-office customer management operations at Pitney Bowes. Results achieved in under 90 days.
Nationwide retail-banking transformation.
Loan-origination platform stabilization across the branch network. Diagnosed and resolved in under six months. Bank not named at its own request.
Medicare claims processing, onshore and offshore.
3,053 claims across 107 subtypes. Identified opportunities, not realized savings; the 69% applies to active time only, which was 65% of total time.
18 years of operational discovery3 granted patents
These names are published with permission. Each name below comes from an engagement in which we measured how the work was actually performed. Where an outcome is published, it is attributed to the specific engagement it came from, with its scope and method attached — a name on this list is not a claim about a result.
Named with permission
Published outcomes are attributed individually, with their scope and method, in the stories below.
Operations leaders share what they saw, what changed, and why they chose to work with Stereologic. Roles are given as held at the time of each engagement.
Seven organizations have presented publicly alongside Stereologic. Detailed outcomes are published here as their scope, period and method can be sourced, so the named list is longer than the story list.
If you are assessing us for a procurement file, this is the table to read. Where something is not published, it says so rather than leaving a gap.
| Pitney Bowes | Global Health Insurance Company | |
|---|---|---|
| Customer context | Named customer: Pitney Bowes. | No customer named. An anonymized U.S. Medicare claims-processing operation, onshore and offshore. |
| Scope | Back-office customer management operations. | Onshore and offshore Medicare claims processing. 3,053 claims across 107 claim subtypes — 81 Professional, 26 Institutional. |
| Timeframe | Measured in under 90 days. | A five-week engagement: one week to plan and prepare, three to record and analyze, one to report. |
| Calculation method | Reductions against the same operation’s starting position, as stated in the published case study. | Identified savings and throughput opportunities, not realized savings. The 69% applies to active time only, which was 65% of total time, so it is not 69% of total employee time. Throughput figures are modeled opportunities. |
| Source | Stereologic’s published Pitney Bowes case study. | Published in anonymized form — no customer name and no identifying operational detail. |
Two things follow from that table. The Pitney Bowes figures are the ones to use if you need a named reference with realized results. The Medicare analysis is the one to read if you want to see the size of opportunity the method surfaces inside a complex operation — identified, quantified and traced back to specific activities, published without a customer name.
Where the platform runs, what it touches and what documentation is available for a security review are set out on one page. What a measured baseline of your own operation would contain, in a defined scope and a fixed period, is set out on another.
Bring one operation you are being asked to improve, automate or defend. We will show what a measured baseline of it looks like — and any number that comes out of it will arrive with its scope, its period and its method attached.